Sigma Review (2025) | Multi-Chain Telegram Bot: 7 Chains

Table of Contents

Quick Video Guide

Video thumbnail

Quick Verdict

At a glance overview

4

Sigma consolidates 7 blockchains (Ethereum, BSC, Base, Solana, Avalanche, Polygon, Arbitrum) into single Telegram bot. Eliminated juggling 4 separate bots with unified wallet and interface. Best for multi-chain traders wanting simplified workflow without bot chaos.

Pros

  • 7 blockchains in one bot - no more juggling separate Telegram bots
  • Unified wallet system works seamlessly across all chains
  • Same commands and interface regardless of blockchain
  • Eliminates confusion of managing multiple bots
  • Competitive fees across all supported chains

Cons

  • Generalist approach may lack chain-specific optimizations
  • Newer bot with smaller community vs established alternatives
  • Managing 7 chains can still be complex for beginners
  • Some advanced features limited compared to specialized bots
Best for: Multi-chain traders tired of managing separate bots for each blockchain

Sigma Review: One Bot, Seven Blockchains, Zero Hassle

I was juggling four different Telegram bots. Unibot for Ethereum, Banana Gun for Base, Bonkbot for Solana, and some random bot for BSC that I barely remembered existed.

My Telegram was a disaster. I’d open the wrong bot, send transactions to the wrong chain, miss opportunities because I forgot which bot did what.

Then I found Sigma - one bot that handles Ethereum, BSC, Base, Solana, Avalanche, Unichain, and Berachain. Same interface, same wallets (multi-chain enabled), same muscle memory across seven networks.

Three months later, I’ve traded on 5 different chains through one bot. I’m up $16,200 total, and I’ve saved countless hours not switching between bots. My Telegram is finally clean.

What is Sigma?

Sigma is a multi-chain Telegram trading bot designed for “degen trading” across major EVM chains and Solana.

Supported chains:

  • Ethereum
  • Binance Smart Chain (BSC)
  • Base Chain
  • Solana
  • Avalanche
  • Unichain
  • Berachain

Quick Stats: Telegram-based | 7 chains | 1% trading fee per transaction | Automatic chain detection | Sniping tools | Copy trading | MEV & re-org protection | Anti-rug system | Advanced analytics

Think of it as the universal remote for crypto trading - one interface controls everything.

Why Multi-Chain Matters

Before Sigma (4 separate bots):

  • Ethereum opportunities → Open Unibot
  • Base opportunities → Open Banana Gun
  • Solana opportunities → Open Bonkbot
  • BSC opportunities → Open… wait, which bot was that again?

Result: Missed trades while fumbling between bots. Confused which wallet was which. Accidentally sent wrong amounts because I mixed up bot interfaces.

With Sigma (one bot):

  • Any chain → Open Sigma, type /chain, select network
  • Same interface every time
  • Same wallet structure (Wallet 1 works on all chains)
  • Zero mental overhead switching chains

Real example: Saw Base opportunity, traded it. 10 minutes later, saw Solana opportunity, switched chains in 5 seconds, caught it. Both through Sigma. Used to require opening two different bots - now it’s seamless.

Automatic Chain Detection

This is Sigma’s best quality-of-life feature. You don’t need to manually switch chains.

How it works: Paste a token contract address (CA) into Sigma. Bot automatically detects which chain it’s on and switches for you.

Example:

  1. I see Ethereum token trending on Twitter
  2. Copy CA, paste into Sigma
  3. Sigma: “Ethereum token detected, switched to ETH”
  4. I hit buy
  5. Done in 10 seconds

vs manual: With separate bots, I’d need to recognize it’s Ethereum, open Unibot, paste CA, buy. Extra steps = missed speed.

Multi-Wallet Strategy Across Chains

Sigma supports multiple wallets, and each wallet works on every chain.

My 5-wallet setup:

Wallet 1 - “Main” ($12K split across chains):

  • $5K on Ethereum (high-value plays)
  • $3K on Base (mid-cap memecoins)
  • $2K on Solana (sniping)
  • $1K on BSC (degen plays)
  • $1K on Avalanche (occasional opportunities)

Wallet 2 - “Sniper” ($4K total):

  • Dedicated to launch sniping across all chains
  • Quick in/out, high-risk

Wallet 3 - “Holdings” ($8K):

  • Long-term positions I’m not actively trading
  • Spread across ETH, Base, Solana

Wallet 4 - “Copy Trading” ($3K):

  • Following wallets on Ethereum and Base
  • Auto-copy enabled

Wallet 5 - “Testing” ($500):

  • Try new strategies, test features
  • If I blow it up, no big deal

The advantage: One wallet structure manages $27.5K across 7 chains. With separate bots, I’d have 20+ different wallets to track.

Sniping Across Chains

Sigma’s sniping works identically on all supported chains.

Features:

  • Auto-buy on token launch detection
  • Configurable slippage and gas
  • Anti-rug checks (honeypot, mint functions, blacklist detection)
  • MEV protection
  • Auto-sell with TP/SL

My Base sniping strategy:

  • Monitor Base launches via Sigma
  • Auto-sniper enabled: $300 per launch, max 3/day
  • TP: 3x, SL: -40%, 60-second timeout
  • Anti-rug protection ON

Results (6 weeks): 14 snipes executed, 5 winners (36%), net +$1,840

My Solana sniping strategy:

  • Manual sniping only (too many Solana scams for auto)
  • Review each launch, only snipe strong signals
  • $400-600 per snipe
  • TP: 50% at 2x, 50% at 4x, SL: -30%

Results (6 weeks): 11 snipes, 4 winners (36%), net +$1,680

Key insight: Same win rate (~36%) across Base and Solana. Sigma’s sniping is consistently mediocre regardless of chain. Better than random (would be ~20%), but not amazing.

Copy Trading (EVM Only)

Sigma supports wallet tracking and auto-copy, but only on EVM chains (Ethereum, BSC, Base, Avalanche).

Setup: Add wallet address, select chain, enable auto-copy, set parameters

My tracked wallets:

  • Wallet A on Ethereum: Whale trader, conservative → $500/copy → +$2,400 (8 weeks)
  • Wallet B on Base: Degen trader, aggressive → $300/copy → +$800 (8 weeks)

Why only 2 wallets? Sigma’s copy trading is basic. No advanced features like Axiom (no Twitter monitoring, no multi-signal). I only use it for high-conviction wallets.

MEV & Re-org Protection

Sigma includes protection against MEV (front-running) and blockchain reorganizations.

What this prevents:

  • Bots seeing your transaction and front-running it
  • Failed transactions due to chain re-orgs
  • Getting worse prices due to sandwich attacks

Impact: I don’t have hard data, but my failed transaction rate on Sigma (~3%) is lower than what I experienced on Unibot (~7%). Anecdotally, protection works.

The 1% Fee Across All Chains

Trading fee: 1% per transaction on every chain

No discount structure: Unlike some bots (Trojan 0.9% with referrals), Sigma is flat 1%

My monthly fees (~$80K volume): $800/month

vs chain-specific bots:

  • Unibot (Ethereum): 1%
  • Banana Gun (Base): 1%
  • Bonkbot (Solana): 1%
  • BSC bot: 1%

No savings on fees, but massive time savings from consolidation.

What Could Be Better

1% fee flat (no discounts, no cashback)
Copy trading EVM-only (doesn’t work on Solana)
Copy trading is basic (no advanced features like Axiom)
Sniping win rate is mediocre (36% across chains)
No web terminal (Telegram only)
Chain switching requires command (automatic detection only works by CA paste)
Support can be slow (12-24 hour response times)

Sigma vs Chain-Specific Bots

FeatureSigmaUnibot (ETH)Bonkbot (SOL)Banana Gun (Base)
Chains7 chainsETH onlySOL onlyBase+ETH
Fee1%1%1%1%
Sniping✅ All chains✅ ETH✅ SOL✅ Base
Copy Trading✅ EVM only✅ Yes❌ No❌ No
MEV Protection✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes
Auto Chain Detect✅ YesN/AN/A✅ Yes
Interface Consistency✅ Same everywhereN/AN/AN/A

Winner for multi-chain: Sigma (obvious)
Winner for single-chain speed: Chain-specific bots (slightly faster)
Winner for simplicity: Sigma (one bot vs juggling many)

My Results After 3 Months

Starting: $20,000 spread across chains
Current: $36,200
Profit: +$16,200 (+81%)
Trades: 218 total across 5 chains
Win rate: 44% overall

By chain:

  • Ethereum: +$4,800 (52 trades, 48% win rate - most profitable)
  • Base: +$6,200 (87 trades, 46% win rate - most active)
  • Solana: +$3,600 (51 trades, 39% win rate)
  • BSC: +$1,200 (22 trades, 41% win rate)
  • Avalanche: +$400 (6 trades, 50% win rate - small sample)

Fees paid: ~$2,400 (on ~$240K total volume)

Key insight: Base is my highest profit chain ($6.2K) because I’m most active there (87 trades). Sigma’s multi-chain convenience encouraged me to trade Base more, which turned out to be my best-performing chain.

Biggest win: Ethereum memecoin via copy trading, $1,500 → $5,250 (+250%, $3,750 profit)

Worst loss: Base rug, ignored anti-rug warnings, lost $680 (-85%)

Getting Started Strategy

Week 1: Start bot (t.me/Sigma_buyBot), create 2 wallets (Main + Testing), fund testing wallet with $200-300, practice switching chains, make 5-10 test trades across 2-3 chains

Week 2: Fund main wallet with $1-3K, split across 3 chains (e.g., $1K ETH, $1K Base, $1K Solana), trade on each chain, figure out which you like best

Week 3: Add 1-2 wallets for copy trading (EVM chains only), test auto-copy with small amounts ($100-200), enable sniping on your favorite chain with conservative settings

Week 4+: Allocate capital based on which chains performed best, withdraw 25% profits monthly, consolidate your trading into Sigma (close other bots)

Multi-Chain Risk Management

My rules: Max 10% portfolio per trade on any chain | Each chain has its own allocation (don’t over-concentrate) | ETH/Base get most capital (lowest risk) | Solana/BSC get less (higher scam risk) | Always check anti-rug warnings | Withdraw profits from each chain weekly

Chain risk assessment:

  • Ethereum: Lowest scam risk, but highest gas fees
  • Base: Good balance of speed + safety
  • Solana: Fastest, but highest rug risk (95% are scams)
  • BSC: Medium risk, low fees, but less activity now
  • Avalanche: Low activity, only trade if strong signal

The Multi-Chain Strategy Advantage

The unexpected benefit of Sigma: chain diversification leads to more opportunities.

Before (single-chain bots): I’d wait for Ethereum opportunities. If nothing looked good, I’d sit idle or force trades.

After (Sigma): Ethereum quiet? Check Base. Base quiet? Check Solana. One of seven chains usually has something interesting.

Result: My trading frequency increased 40% without increasing risk per trade. More opportunities = more profit.

But: Requires discipline not to overtrade just because options exist.

Final Verdict

Sigma solved my multi-chain chaos. One bot, seven chains, same interface everywhere. The consolidation saved hours of mental overhead and countless missed trades from fumbling between bots.

Pros:

  • 7 chains in one bot (Ethereum, BSC, Base, Solana, Avalanche, Unichain, Berachain)
  • Automatic chain detection
  • Multi-wallet works across all chains
  • Sniping on all chains
  • Copy trading (EVM chains)
  • MEV & re-org protection
  • Anti-rug system
  • Interface consistency

Cons:

  • 1% flat fee (no discounts/cashback)
  • Copy trading EVM-only
  • Copy trading is basic
  • Mediocre sniping win rates
  • Telegram only (no web)
  • Support can be slow
  • Chain switching via command (not instant)

Recommend? Yes, if you trade 3+ chains regularly. The consolidation is worth it. Not ideal if you’re chain-purist (single-chain bots are slightly faster) or want advanced copy trading (use Axiom).

If you’re tired of managing multiple bots, Sigma is the solution. I went from 4 bots to 1, my Telegram is clean, and I’m up $16.2K in 3 months across 5 chains.

The fees aren’t cheaper, but the simplicity is priceless.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which 7 chains does Sigma support?

Sigma supports Ethereum, BSC (Binance Smart Chain), Base, Solana, Avalanche, Polygon, and Arbitrum. This covers most major DeFi ecosystems in one unified Telegram bot. You can trade across all chains using the same wallet and commands without switching bots.

How does Sigma compare to chain-specific bots?

Sigma trades convenience for specialization. Chain-specific bots (like Bonkbot for Solana) may have deeper optimizations and features. However, Sigma eliminates juggling multiple bots, remembering different commands, and managing separate wallets. For multi-chain traders, the unified experience outweighs missing niche features.

Do I need different wallets for each chain?

No. Sigma uses a unified wallet system where your single wallet works across all 7 supported chains. The bot handles chain-specific addressing, gas tokens, and transaction routing automatically. Fund your wallet once and trade on any chain without separate wallet setup.

What are Sigma's trading fees?

Sigma charges standard Telegram bot fees (typically 0.5-1% per trade) across all supported chains. Fees are competitive with chain-specific alternatives. You also pay network gas fees specific to each blockchain. No subscriptions or hidden costs - just per-trade fees and gas.

Is Sigma safe and legitimate?

Sigma is non-custodial - you control your keys and funds. However, it's a newer bot compared to established alternatives, so use caution: start with small amounts, verify official Telegram bot, never share seed phrases. The multi-chain approach adds complexity, so understand how cross-chain transactions work.

Sigma vs BasedBot (both multi-chain)?

Both offer multi-chain trading in one bot. BasedBot supports 12 chains vs Sigma's 7. Sigma focuses on major DeFi chains with deeper integration. BasedBot casts wider net. Choose based on which chains you actually trade - if you use Ethereum, BSC, Base, Solana, Avalanche, both work. BasedBot better if you need Blast, zkSync, Linea.

Disclaimer: This review is based on personal experience and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency trading with leverage involves extreme risk, and you can lose your entire investment. Always do your own research, start small, and never trade with funds you cannot afford to lose. Platform features and availability are subject to change.